ASKiIMAN™ ARCHIVE / INDIAN POLITY
--:-- · -- --- ----
🐾

Motions in Parliament

Devices of Disruption, Accountability & Reprimand

PART I — DISRUPTION OF NORMALCY

URGENT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

Adjournment Motion

  • Introduced in the Parliament to draw the attention of the House to a definite matter of **urgent public importance**.
  • Requires the support of **50 members** to be admitted.
  • It interrupts the normal business of the House. Because it involves an element of censure against the government, it is permitted **only in the Lok Sabha**.
BREACH OF DIGNITY

Privilege Motion

  • Moved by a member when they feel a minister has committed a breach of privilege of the House.
  • Triggered usually if a minister **withholds facts** of a case or gives **distorted facts** to the House.
  • Its primary purpose is to censure the concerned minister. It can be moved in **both LS and RS**.

PART II — THE TESTS OF SURVIVAL

ARTICLE 75(3)

No-Confidence Motion

▶
  • The ultimate test of government survival. Needs the support of **50 members** to be admitted.
  • It does **not need to state the reasons** for its adoption.
  • It can be moved against the **entire Council of Ministers only**, not individual ministers.
  • If passed by a majority in the Lok Sabha, the government **must resign**. (Permitted only in LS).
SEVERE REPRIMAND

Censure Motion

  • Distinct from a No-Confidence Motion. It **must state the reasons** for its adoption.
  • Can be moved against an **individual minister**, a group of ministers, or the entire council.
  • Moved to censure the government for specific policies or actions.
  • If passed, the Council of Ministers **need not resign**, but it exerts massive political pressure. (Permitted only in LS).
Return to Index: Indian Polity